Liese assures her husband she didn’t take part in the horrors of Auschwitz. The music takes on a carnival sound at that point, perhaps mocking her. Liese complains that Marta didn’t appreciate her acts of kindness—she seems to be experiencing a cognitive dissonance. What do people do with themselves after committing these horrific acts? I find it interesting that Zofia Posmysz, a Polish Catholic political prisoner at Auschwitz who wrote the original radio play and then novel upon which this opera is based, wrote this from the perspective of the SS guard. Was this an attempt to identify with the guards and have some sense of power? Did this give her or perhaps Weinberg, who fled Poland for Russia as the Nazis invaded Poland and lost his entire family, the ability to exact some sort of revenge or punishment even if it’s only through story?But regardless of all this arrayed excellence, I found it too long as the action lost me at several points and I found my mind wandering. I think I know why. The action is presented to us within the context of Liese confessing to her husband her past as an Auschwitz overseer. But huge long sections of the opera take place in the women’s barracks of Auschwitz without Liese being present there. Thusly she could not know what had gone on in her absence. The long, extended sections between the women inmates in Auschwitz, while full of some very beautiful and moving music, serve only to expand on and deepen the female inmate characters, independently of Liese’s experience and do not fit within the narrative perspective of Liese confessing this experience to her husband.
– Elizabeth Frayer & Shawn E Milnes
Related Links:
Looming Strikes and Sterling Tenors: La Cenerentola at the Metropolitan Opera


Leave a Reply